Case study: Enterprise integration and process improvement
Enterprise Architecture and Integration: Methods, Implementation and Technologies, Page: 240-254
2007
- 1Citations
- 9Usage
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
- Usage9
- Abstract Views9
- Captures2
- Readers2
Book Chapter Description
Enterprise integration (EI) can be a major enabler for business process improvement, but it presents its own challenges. Based on the process improvement experiences of banks in several different countries, this chapter examines common EI challenges and outlines approaches for combining EI and process improvement to achieve maximum benefit. Common EI-related process improvement challenges are poor usability within the user desktop environment, a lack of network-based services, and data collection and management limitations. How EI affects each of these areas is addressed, highlighting specific examples of how these issues present themselves in system environments. The latter part of this chapter outlines best practices for combining EI with process improvement in relation to the challenges identified. Guidelines are provided on how to apply these practices in different organizational contexts. © 2007, IGI Global.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84900590554&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-887-1.ch014; http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/978-1-59140-887-1.ch014; https://www.igi-global.com/viewtitle.aspx?TitleId=18372; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/6266; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7269&context=sis_research; https://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-887-1.ch014; https://www.igi-global.com/gateway/chapter/18372
IGI Global
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know