From Asset Flow to Status, Action, and Intention Discovery: Early Malice Detection in Cryptocurrency
ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, ISSN: 1556-472X, Vol: 18, Issue: 3, Page: 1-27
2023
- 1Citations
- 61Usage
- 11Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- Usage61
- Abstract Views38
- Downloads23
- Captures11
- Readers11
- 11
Article Description
Cryptocurrency has been subject to illicit activities probably more often than traditional financial assets due to the pseudo-anonymous nature of its transacting entities. An ideal detection model is expected to achieve all three critical properties of early detection, good interpretability, and versatility for various illicit activities. However, existing solutions cannot meet all these requirements, as most of them heavily rely on deep learning without interpretability and are only available for retrospective analysis of a specific illicit type. To tackle all these challenges, we propose Intention Monitor for early malice detection in Bitcoin, where the on-chain record data for a certain address are much scarcer than other cryptocurrency platforms.We first define asset transfer paths with the Decision Tree based feature Selection and Complement to build different feature sets for different malice types. Then, the Status/Action Proposal module and the Intention-VAE module generate the status, action, intent-snippet, and hidden intent-snippet embedding. With all these modules, our model is highly interpretable and can detect various illegal activities. Moreover, well-designed loss functions further enhance the prediction speed and the model's interpretability. Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate that our proposed algorithm outperforms the state-of-the-art methods. Furthermore, additional case studies justify that our model not only explains existing illicit patterns but also can find new suspicious characters.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85182608161&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3626102; https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3626102; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/8598; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=9601&context=sis_research; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/9426; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=10426&context=sis_research; https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3626102
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know