Building a web of trust without explicit trust ratings
Proceedings - International Conference on Data Engineering, ISSN: 1084-4627, Page: 531-536
2008
- 38Citations
- 129Usage
- 43Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations38
- Citation Indexes38
- 38
- CrossRef4
- Usage129
- Downloads96
- Abstract Views33
- Captures43
- Readers43
- 43
Conference Paper Description
A satisfactory and robust trust model is gaining importance in addressing information overload, and helping users collect reliable information in online communities. Current research on trust prediction strongly relies on a web of trust, which is directly collected from users based on previous experience. However, the web of trust is not always available in online communities and even though it is available, it is often too sparse to predict the trust value between two unacquainted people with high accuracy. In this paper, we propose a framework to derive degree of trust based on users' expertise and users' affinity for certain contexts (topics), using users rating data which is available and much more dense than direct trust data. In experiments with a real-world dataset, we show that our model can predict trust connectivity with a high degree of accuracy. With this framework, we can predict trust connectivity and degree of trust without a web of trust and then apply it to online community applications, e.g. e-commerce environments with users rating data. © 2008 IEEE.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=50249085086&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icdew.2008.4498374; http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4498374/; http://xplorestaging.ieee.org/ielx5/4492761/4498260/04498374.pdf?arnumber=4498374; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/929; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1928&context=sis_research
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know