Tunneling through Non-Operational Fund Occupancy: An investigation based on officially identified activities
Journal of Corporate Finance, ISSN: 0929-1199, Vol: 32, Page: 295-311
2015
- 70Citations
- 301Usage
- 97Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations70
- Citation Indexes66
- 66
- CrossRef35
- Policy Citations4
- 4
- Usage301
- Downloads245
- Abstract Views56
- Captures97
- Readers97
- 97
Article Description
In this paper, we investigate the problem of controlling shareholder Non-Operational Fund Occupancy (NOFO) in China, where controlling shareholders directly take funds away from listed firms without matching business transactions. The NOFO problem was an evident and widely used tunneling activity in China and was identified by the securities market regulators. Unlike previous literature that used indirect measures of tunneling, we directly collect the actual amounts of NOFO from mandated disclosures and utilize this direct measure of tunneling in a series of empirical tests. First, we examine and find that various mechanisms such as ownership structure, corporate governance and institutional environments could restrain tunneling activities. Second, we find significantly positive market reactions to regulations that aimed to solve the NOFO problem. Third, we find evidence that the operating performance and valuation of firms with a NOFO problem improved after the regulations went into effect. Our study sheds light on the severe issue of minority shareholder expropriation and the effectiveness of regulators' policy to remedy the tunneling problem.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929119914001278; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.10.011; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84953638363&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0929119914001278; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0929119914001278?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0929119914001278?httpAccept=text/plain; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/1671; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2698&context=soa_research
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know