Public audit oversight and the originate-to-distribute model
Journal of Accounting and Economics, ISSN: 0165-4101, Vol: 72, Issue: 1, Page: 101420
2021
- 10Citations
- 268Usage
- 66Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- CrossRef1
- Usage268
- Downloads241
- Abstract Views27
- Captures66
- Readers66
- 66
Article Description
The originate-to-distribute (OTD) model, in which the originators of mortgages sell or securitize the mortgages to third parties, likely contributed to the 2008 financial crisis. Auditors were blamed for permitting clients to understate the risks of the model in their financial reports, fostering undisciplined lending. We investigate whether public audit oversight influences OTD lending by promoting more vigilant audits of the financial reports of originators. Using a difference-in-differences design prior to the financial crisis, we find reduced OTD lending by banks after the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) criticizes their auditors’ audits of financial reports regarding OTD transactions. The reduction is greater for banks with poorer risk controls and stronger incentives to manage earnings. We also find a reduction in gains on loan sales and securitizations. The results suggest that PCAOB inspections can help discipline OTD lending, a real effect of public audit oversight in the United States.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165410121000355; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2021.101420; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85107034216&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165410121000355; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/1916; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2943&context=soa_research; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2021.101420
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know