The Effects of Team-Skills Guidance on Student Project Teams
American Accounting Association Annual Meeting
2012
- 19Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage19
- Abstract Views19
Conference Paper Description
This paper reports an experiment investigating the effects of team-skills guidance on accounting student team performance and outcomes. We examine how in-class team skills discussion sessions with a course instructor impacts student perceptions of the usefulness of team work, team performance, and team project outcomes. We find that while students perceive positive benefits from engaging in team work, those who receive in-class team-skills guidance perceive fewer benefits. Students who undergo such in-class team-skills guidance also rate their own contributions to the team project, as well as the contributions of their team members, lower than students who do not. These findings suggest that students who receive in-class team-skills guidance have higher expectations of themselves and of their team mates, and are more critical in their evaluation of how the team worked together and the quality of the team project submitted. We discuss the implications of our findings.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know