Calculation of critical values for Dunnett and Tamhane's step-up multiple test procedure
Statistics & Probability Letters, ISSN: 0167-7152, Vol: 49, Issue: 4, Page: 411-416
2000
- 22Citations
- 81Usage
- 13Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations22
- Citation Indexes22
- 22
- CrossRef19
- Usage81
- Abstract Views81
- Captures13
- Readers13
- 13
Article Description
Dunnett and Tamhane (1992, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 87, 162–170; 1993, Statist. Probab. Lett. 16 (1), 55–58; 1995, Biometrics 51, 217–227) proposed a step-up testing procedure for comparing k treatments with a control and showed that it is often more powerful than its competitors, the single-step (Dunnett, 1955, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 50, 1096–1121) and the step-down (Miller, 1966, Simultaneous Statistical Inference, McGraw-Hill, New York; Dunnett and Tamhane, 1991, Statist Med. 10 (6), 939–947) procedures. However, the applications of the step-up procedure may be hindered by the lengthy time for computing the required critical values, especially when the design of experiment is unbalanced or the value of k is large. In this paper we propose some more efficient approaches to the computation of the critical values to make the step-up test more applicable.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715200000766; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0167-7152(00)00076-6; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0008877250&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167715200000766; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167715200000766; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0167715200000766?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0167715200000766?httpAccept=text/plain; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/194; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1193&context=soe_research; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0167-7152%2800%2900076-6
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know