Singapore
Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution Annual Review 2019
2019
- 17Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage17
- Abstract Views17
Book Description
China and India contribute to a significant number of disputes in the region. According to 2018 Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) statistics, the US topped the foreign user rankings in 2018 for the first time, with India and China both continuing to be strong contributors of cases to the SIAC over the past few years. The SIAC’s other top 10 foreign users were from a mix of common and civil law jurisdictions, namely the Cayman Islands, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, South Korea and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) – attesting to the SIAC’s popularity among users globally, and not just regionally.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know