Regulating personal data usage in COVID-19 control conditions
Regulatory Insights on Artificial Intelligence, Page: 102-128
2022
- 4Usage
- 17Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage4
- Abstract Views2
- Downloads2
- Captures17
- Readers17
- 17
Book Chapter Description
Concern has been widely expressed about the potential for COVID-19 control technologies and resultant data sharing negatively impacting on civil rights, invading personal privacy, undermining citizen dignity through expansive data matching and ultimately providing opportunities for data use well beyond the brief of virus mitigation. This chapter offers suggestions regarding effective and inclusive regulatory responses when faced with extended surveillance, tracking/tracing, public/private provider data sharing and any breakdown in personal data firewalls, or otherwise conventional aggregated data deviations and distortion. In doing so, the chapter explores personal data usage in the context of COVID-19 as a regulatory enterprise. It addresses four fundamental features influencing the ultimate regulatory decision and direction: why, when, where and what, and presents a regulatory strategy to address the challenges of data usage in COVID-19 control conditions. It is proposed that this model is based on three facets. Firstly, the creation of an independent agency that researches potential personal data challenges transitioning out of the control situations. Secondly, Enforced Self-regulation Units tasked with the responsible operation and eventual decommissioning of surveillance technologies, and their data repositories, on a technology-specific focus. Thirdly, Civil Society Empowerment Initiatives that act as a counterbalance to the negative impact strenuous data protection regulation may have on current and future pandemic control strategies.
Bibliographic Details
Edward Elgar Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know