Whole-lung Lavage and Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis: Review of Clinical and Patient-centered Outcomes
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, ISSN: 1053-0770, Vol: 33, Issue: 9, Page: 2453-2461
2019
- 20Citations
- 8Usage
- 30Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations20
- Citation Indexes20
- 20
- CrossRef2
- Usage8
- Abstract Views8
- Captures30
- Readers30
- 30
Article Description
The objective of this retrospective review was to evaluate the perioperative and procedural management of patients with pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) who presented for whole-lung lavage (WLL). The records of all adult patients with PAP who underwent WLL between January 1, 1988 and August 20, 2017 were reviewed and pertinent demographic, preoperative, anesthetic, procedural, and postoperative data were recorded. Large academic tertiary referral center. Forty patients with PAP underwent 79 WLL procedures. Patients with PAP undergoing WLL. Successful WLL, defined by visual clearing of lavage fluid, was completed in 91% of cases. Whole-lung lavage was terminated prematurely in 9% of cases (refractory hypoxia most common), while 8% of cases were found to have 30-day complications. There were no cases of intraoperative death, hemodynamic collapse, pneumothorax or hydrothorax, or need for emergent reintubation. Postoperative clinical follow-up at the authors’ institution within 6 months of WLL showed 68% of patients reported improvement in symptoms and/or functional status. The authors here present a retrospective study describing the perioperative and procedural management of PAP patients undergoing WLL to help familiarize providers with the management of this population (Fig 1). The findings of this study outline a successful and consistent approach to WLL using a multidisciplinary team experienced in this procedure. Even in experienced hands, procedural complications and 30-day postoperative complications emphasize the risk in this complex patient population.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053077019303076; http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2019.03.047; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85068689928&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31307910; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053077019303076; https://institutionalrepository.aah.org/pul/9; https://institutionalrepository.aah.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=pul; https://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2019.03.047
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know