A survey on data aggregation mechanisms in wireless sensor networks
2015 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies, ICICT 2015, Page: 1-7
2016
- 13Citations
- 1Usage
- 17Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations13
- Citation Indexes13
- 13
- Usage1
- Abstract Views1
- Captures17
- Readers17
- 17
Conference Paper Description
Data aggregation has been an important mechanism for achieving energy efflciency in WSN's. The aggregation reduces the transmission of redundant data which results in improved energy usage. A large number of data aggregation protocols have been developed in the past based on various techniques of optimizing the delay and energy. This paper surveyed the most prominent data aggregation protocols recently developed, from the categories of structured, structure free and hybrid. Based on the analysis, it came to light that the structured protocols fit well to the static environments (where the cluster head remains same and the nodes do not die), as the energy consumption can be kept at minimum by reducing the number of message exchanges required for setting up the network. On the other hand, for the dynamic environments, the structure free protocols are feasible as the cost of setting up a network structure increases. The hybrid data aggregation protocols have recently been introduced in order to take advantage from both the earlier approaches. The directions for future research are suggested in the light of surveyed protocols.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84973916828&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icict.2015.7469596; http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7469596/; http://xplorestaging.ieee.org/ielx7/7464753/7469477/07469596.pdf?arnumber=7469596; https://ir.iba.edu.pk/faculty-research-series/93; https://ir.iba.edu.pk/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1092&context=faculty-research-series
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know