Note, Eugenic Feminism: Mental Hygiene, the Women's Movement, and the Campaign for Eugenic Legal Reform, 1900-1935
Harvard Journal of Law & Gender, Vol: 31, Issue: 1, Page: 211-235
2008
- 2,697Usage
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage2,697
- Downloads2,041
- 2,041
- Abstract Views656
- Mentions1
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Article Description
It is well for every woman, however, to think this matter through and to realize that any women’s movement that is correlated with sterility is doomed to fail and annihilation. What shall it profit us eugenically to have women delve in laboratories, or search the heavens, or rule the nations, if the world is to be peopled by scrubwomen and peasants? – Anna M. Blount, Eugenics, in Woman and the Larger Citizenship, 2847, 2904-05 (Shailer Mathews ed., 1913).Part I of this article examines the evolution of eugenic thought and policy in the United States between 1880 and 1935, and uses it to illustrate the increasing tension between eugenic theory and law and the arguments of eugenic feminists. Part II completes this illustration by considering three of the most important feminist reformers, Victoria Woodhull, Charlotte Perkins Gilman, and Margaret Sanger, and their treatment of eugenic science. Studying the work of these three feminists helps explain the creation, evolution, and decline of eugenic feminism. Finally, Part III concludes by considering the reasons for eugenic feminism’s decline and the contradictions inherent in the movement.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know