An Analysis of the Conflicts Between Congressional Import Quotas and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
Vol: 9, Issue: 3, Page: 734
1985
- 502Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage502
- Downloads467
- Abstract Views35
Artifact Description
This Note will discuss recent US import quotas in light of the United States' obligations under GATT. Part I of this Note will examine the legal frameworks of the US Constitution, GATT, and section 301. Part Ii will focus on the domestic and international conflicts that have stemmed from recent protectionist legislation proposed by Congress. Part III will criticize the conflict between the President and congress, the application of section 301, and the dispute resolution provisions of GATT. Finally, Part IV will propose improvements for the performance of the United States under GATT and section 301. This Note will conclude that the United States must improve its trade policy by coordinating its trade actions with section 301 and GATT.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know