Utilising Indigenous seasonal knowledge to understand aquatic resource use and inform water resource management in northern Australia
Ecological Management and Restoration, ISSN: 1442-7001, Vol: 13, Issue: 1, Page: 58-64
2012
- 81Citations
- 908Usage
- 122Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations81
- Citation Indexes70
- 70
- CrossRef59
- Policy Citations11
- Policy Citation11
- Usage908
- Downloads883
- Abstract Views25
- Captures122
- Readers122
- 122
Article Description
Indigenous ecological knowledge can inform contemporary water management activities including water allocation planning. This paper draws on results obtained from a 3-year study to reveal the connection between Indigenous socio-economic values and river flows in the Daly River, Northern Territory. Qualitative phenological knowledge was analysed and compared to quantitative resource-use data, obtained through a large household survey of Indigenous harvesting and fishing effort. A more complete picture of Indigenous resource-use and management strategies was found to be provided by the adoption of mixed methods. The quantitative data revealed resource-use patterns including when and where species are harvested. The qualitative Indigenous ecological data validated results from the quantitative surveys and provided insights into harvesting and resource management strategies not revealed by the discrete time-bound surveys. As such, it informed the scientific understanding of patterns of resource use and relationships between people, subsistence use and river flows in the Daly River catchment. We recommend that natural resource managers, researchers and Indigenous experts prioritise collaborative projects that record Indigenous knowledge to improve water managers' understanding of Indigenous customary aquatic resource use. © 2012 Ecological Society of Australia.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84856271008&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-8903.2011.00622.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1442-8903.2011.00622.x; https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/aprci/318; https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1126&context=aprci; http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1442-8903.2011.00622.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1442-8903.2011.00622.x
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know