PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

A Comparison of the Mechanical Measures Used for Assessing Orthodontic Mini-Implant Stability

Implant Dentistry, ISSN: 1056-6163, Vol: 26, Issue: 2, Page: 225-231
2017
  • 8
    Citations
  • 2
    Usage
  • 40
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Article Description

Purpose: Mechanical loosening remains a common complication associated with mini-implant failure. The purpose of this study was to compare common mechanical measures of mini-implant stability to determine their association and reliability. Materials and Methods: Ninety self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants from 6 manufacturers were inserted into artificial bone blocks. Insertion torques (ITs) and Periotest values (PVs) were measured. Subsequently, mini-implants underwent pull-out testing for measures of pull-out load (POL) and screw displacement (ScrD). Stability measurements were compared using one-way ANOVA, associations among them were assessed using correlation analyses, and reliability was evaluated using coefficients of variation (COVs). Results: Variations in stability of mini-implants were found, specific to the mechanical measure used for assessment (P < 0.05). The strongest correlations were found between IT and PV (r =-0.68) and between IT and POL (r = 0.66). Overall, PV showed the greatest variability (COV: 11%-100%) compared with IT (≤11%), POL (≤4%), and ScrD (≤19%). Conclusions: IT, PV, and POLs only agreed moderately in their assessment of mini-implant stability, and Periotest showed the least reliability in predicting mini-implant stability. As such, independent and interchangeable use of these stability measures should be avoided.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know