Can Meaningful Effective Connectivities Be Obtained between Auditory Cortical Regions?
NeuroImage, ISSN: 1053-8119, Vol: 14, Issue: 6, Page: 1353-1360
2001
- 49Citations
- 6Usage
- 62Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations49
- Citation Indexes49
- 49
- CrossRef44
- Usage6
- Downloads5
- Abstract Views1
- Captures62
- Readers62
- 62
Article Description
Structural equation modeling (SEM) of neuroimaging data can be evaluated both for the goodness of fit of the model and for the strength of path coefficients (as an index of effective connectivity). SEM of auditory fMRI data is made difficult by the necessary sparse temporal sampling of the time series (to avoid contamination of auditory activation by the response to scanner noise) and by the paucity of well-defined anatomical information to constrain the functional model. We used SEM (i.e., a model incorporating latent variables) to investigate how well fMRI data in four adjacent cortical fields can be described as an auditory network. Seven of the 14 models (2 hemispheres × (6 subjects and 1 group)) produced a plausible description of the measured data. Since the auditory model to be tested is not fully validated by anatomical data, our approach requires that goodness of fit be confirmed to ensure generalizability of connectivity patterns. For good-fitting models, connectivity patterns varied significantly across subjects and were not replicable across stimulus conditions. SEM of central auditory function therefore appears to be highly sensitive to the voxel-selection procedure and/or the sampling of the time series.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811901909541; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0954; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0035205408&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11707091; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811901909541; https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/brainpub/1207; https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2203&context=brainpub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0954
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know