Transient pupil dilation after subsaccadic microstimulation of primate frontal eye fields
Journal of Neuroscience, ISSN: 1529-2401, Vol: 36, Issue: 13, Page: 3765-3776
2016
- 78Citations
- 80Usage
- 91Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations78
- Citation Indexes78
- 43
- CrossRef37
- Usage80
- Downloads72
- Abstract Views8
- Captures91
- Readers91
- 91
Article Description
Pupillometry provides a simple and noninvasive index for a variety of cognitive processes, including perception, attention, task consolidation, learning, and memory. The neural substrates by which such cognitive processes influence pupil diameter remain somewhat unclear, although cortical inputs to the locus coeruleus mediating arousal are likely involved. Changes in pupil diameter also accompany covert orienting; hence the oculomotor system may provide an alternative substrate for cognitive influences on pupil diameter. Here, we show that low-level electrical microstimulation of the primate frontal eye fields (FEFs), a cortical component of the oculomotor system strongly connected to the intermediate layers of the superior colliculus (SCi), evoked robust pupil dilation even in the absence of evoked saccades. The magnitude of such dilation scaled with increases in stimulation parameters, depending strongly on the intensity and number of pulses. Although there are multiple pathways by which FEF stimulation could cause pupil dilation, the timing and profile of dilation closely resembled that evoked by SCi stimulation. Moreover, pupil dilation evoked from the FEFs increased when presumed oculomotor activity was higher at the time of stimulation. Our findings implicate the oculomotor system as a potential substrate for how cognitive processes can influence pupil diameter. We suggest that a pathway from the frontal cortex through the SCi operates in parallel with frontal inputs to arousal circuits to regulate task-dependent modulation of pupil diameter, perhaps indicative of an organization wherein one pathway assumes primacy for a given cognitive process.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84962018952&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4264-15.2016; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27030761; http://www.jneurosci.org/lookup/doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4264-15.2016; https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4264-15.2016; https://www.jneurosci.org/lookup/doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4264-15.2016; https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/brainpub/132; https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1125&context=brainpub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4264-15.2016; https://www.jneurosci.org/content/36/13/3765; http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4264-15.2016; http://www.jneurosci.org/content/36/13/3765; http://www.jneurosci.org/content/36/13/3765.abstract; http://www.jneurosci.org/content/36/13/3765.full.pdf; https://www.jneurosci.org/content/36/13/3765.abstract; https://www.jneurosci.org/content/jneuro/36/13/3765.full.pdf
Society for Neuroscience
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know