Describing functional diversity of brain regions and brain networks
NeuroImage, ISSN: 1053-8119, Vol: 73, Page: 50-58
2013
- 141Citations
- 3Usage
- 270Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations141
- Citation Indexes141
- 141
- CrossRef63
- Usage3
- Abstract Views3
- Captures270
- Readers270
- 270
Article Description
Despite the general acceptance that functional specialization plays an important role in brain function, there is little consensus about its extent in the brain. We sought to advance the understanding of this question by employing a data-driven approach that capitalizes on the existence of large databases of neuroimaging data. We quantified the diversity of activation in brain regions as a way to characterize the degree of functional specialization. To do so, brain activations were classified in terms of task domains, such as vision, attention, and language, which determined a region's functional fingerprint. We found that the degree of diversity varied considerably across the brain. We also quantified novel properties of regions and of networks that inform our understanding of several task-positive and task-negative networks described in the literature, including defining functional fingerprints for entire networks and measuring their functional assortativity, namely the degree to which they are composed of regions with similar functional fingerprints. Our results demonstrate that some brain networks exhibit strong assortativity, whereas other networks consist of relatively heterogeneous parts. In sum, rather than characterizing the contributions of individual brain regions using task-based functional attributions, we instead quantified their dispositional tendencies, and related those to each region's affiliative properties in both task-positive and task-negative contexts.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811913001183; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.071; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84874386904&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23396162; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811913001183; https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/brainpub/44; https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1050&context=brainpub; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811913001183
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know