STR-850: NUMERICAL MODELLING OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BLOCK STRUCTURAL WALL BUILDINGS UNDER SEISMIC LOADING
2016
- 839Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage839
- Downloads750
- Abstract Views89
Artifact Description
With the recent shift of design code developers’ focus from component- to system-level assessment of seismic force resisting systems, there is a need to numerically assess the performance of whole buildings. However, reinforced concrete block structural wall buildings are complex structural systems composed of materials with nonlinear and heterogeneous properties, which makes the numerical investigation challenging, especially when seismic behavior is considered. Most previous numerical models of reinforced concrete block walls have considered individual components, rather than the complete building system, and have used relatively complex micro-models. In this paper, OpenSees (Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation) is used to create macro non-linear models to simulate the response of two different buildings under unidirectional cyclic loading that represents earthquake effects. The models are created in such a way as to balance the desire for accuracy with the desire for relatively simple models that can be defined using only the geometry and actual material properties, and that are not excessively demanding computationally. Detailed validation of the models is conducted to compare the hysteretic behaviour of the numerical models with available experimental test results on reinforced concrete block structural wall buildings. This paper demonstrates that simple models can, with proper calibration, capture the cyclic response, including energy dissipation and degradation of strength, very well. In this way, this study significantly enhances the database of validated numerical models for reinforced masonry shear wall buildings.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know