Multi-Objective Interdependent VM Placement Model based on Cloud Reliability Evaluation
IEEE International Conference on Communications, ISSN: 1550-3607, Vol: 2020-June, Page: 1-7
2020
- 5Citations
- 6Usage
- 10Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- CrossRef2
- Usage6
- Abstract Views6
- Captures10
- Readers10
- 10
Conference Paper Description
Virtual Machine (VM) placement is considered as one of the crucial problems in Cloud Computing environments. From the perspective of Cloud Service Providers (CSPs), finding the optimal VM placement strategy is often related to optimal resource utilization, revenue maximization, and energy efficiency. However, to ensure the continuity of customer services, CSPs should also consider the reliability of deployed applications when placing VMs on their infrastructures. Existing research in this area either do not focus on the Cloud reliability evaluation aspect or do not account for the trade-off between reliability and performance in the VM placement process. In this paper, we propose a multi-objective placement model for interdependent VMs in the Cloud that considers both reliability and workload. Reliability in our model is quantitatively evaluated through a set of metrics that we propose. The model involves an Integer Linear Programming problem that aims at maximizing the reliability of the Cloud while minimizing network delay. A multi-objective genetic algorithm is then used to solve the problem heuristically. The proposed model introduces a level of flexibility and its parameters could be adjusted depending on the requirements of the infrastructure and services. The results show that our model achieves high Cloud reliability and allows to effectively control the trade-off between reliability and Quality of Service.
Bibliographic Details
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know