Joint Venture Performance In Developing Countries
1985
- 3,530Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage3,530
- Abstract Views1,928
- 1,928
- Downloads1,602
- 1,602
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Given the predominance of joint ventures over wholly owned subsidiaries in less developed countries, the issue of joint-venture performance is an important one. An analysis of the literature, plus a pilot survey conducted as a first step in this research, indicated a weakening of the link between dominant management control and satisfactory performance when the focus shifted from developed to developing countries. This survey of the experience of multinational enterprises (MNEs) in 34 manufacturing joint ventures with local, private firms in developing countries also indicated that many characteristics of joint ventures in developed and developing countries differ significantly. More important, the survey suggested several variables crucial in determining joint venture success: partner need, and commitment.;Using interviews in companies involved in an additional 32 ventures, with particular emphasis on 12 comparative core cases, operational measures of need, commitment, and performance were developed following the pilot survey. A questionnaire incorporating these measures was administered to both the foreign and local partners (where possible) and to the general manager in each of 12 core ventures. The core ventures were from two less technology-intensive sectors. There were both satisfactorily and unsatisfactorily performing ventures in each sector.;Following analysis of the data, a managerial guideline was developed which the research suggests will lead to improved performance of joint ventures in developing countries. The guideline recommends forming joint ventures with partners when there will be a mutual long term need; when the need will be specific rather than general in nature; when the companies are committed to the use of joint ventures; and when a company is committed to the particular joint-venture partner. Staffing with local managers, selling equity to the general manager, and avoiding situations where the MNE has dominant ownership and/or dominant control are additionally recommended.;The research also extends the theory of the multinational enterprise to include an expanded role for joint-equity ventures. This is done in a way that maintains the acceptability of internalization theory as a suitable explanation of the MNE.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know