Canadian Hockey English: Production and Perception
2024
- 388Usage
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage388
- Abstract Views312
- Downloads76
- Mentions2
- News Mentions2
- News2
Most Recent News
Scientists are trying to figure out why hockey players all sound Canadian
Share What’s the weirdest thing you learned this week? Well, whatever it is, we promise you’ll have an even weirder answer if you listen to
Article Description
The present dissertation investigates the English spoken by ice hockey players in Canada, asking whether there might be a distinct language variety that could be called “Canadian Hockey English”. Applying acoustic analysis to recorded samples from the PAC-LVTI Ontario (Canada) Hockey English Corpus, I study two well-known Canadian English phonetic features: Canadian Raising and the Canadian Vowel Shift. I am particularly interested in determining whether these two variables are conditioned by the degree of hockey players’ engagement in the sport. In parallel, using a three-part online survey, I explore anglophone Ontarians’ knowledge and awareness of both Canadian English and Hockey English. I also test whether respondents can identify hockey players’ speech from listening to speech samples. Results of the production component of the study show that the speech of hockey players displays both Canadian features, and that speakers with a higher degree of involvement in the sport show more Canadian Raising in the /ai/ vowel of the PRICE lexical set, but not in the /au/ vowel of MOUTH. The Canadian Vowel Shift, on the other hand, does not appear to be conditioned by this factor of hockey engagement. The results of the perception component indicate that Ontarian respondents associate lexical, spelling and pronunciation features with Canadian English, which they distinguish from both American and British Englishes. Most respondents also acknowledge the existence of Hockey English, which they identify through lexical features, and which they associate with rurality and a lack of education. Some participants report that HE displays stereotypical features of Canadian English. Although respondents are not accurate in their identification of hockey players, the findings provide valuable insight into the influence of the label “hockey player” on respondents’ ratings of the recorded samples of Canadian English.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know