An Examination of Municipal Policy-Makers’ Responses Towards the Provincial Implementation of Retail Cannabis Stores Within Ontario
2019
- 104Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage104
- Downloads75
- Abstract Views29
Artifact Description
The rationale for this study is founded on the important role of municipal governments within the domain of cannabis legalization in Canada. In Ontario, a strategy of privatization for physical cannabis stores was implemented by the provincial government. The policy gave municipalities the authority to decide whether they opted in or out of physical cannabis stores within their specific communities. This scenario of allowing local governments to determine the introduction of physical cannabis stores has demonstrated a need for a deeper understanding towards the various factors that influence the decisions of municipal policy makers. This is a unique situation that offers tremendous learning opportunities in determining the role that local government policy makers have on cannabis legalization policies. This exploratory study utilizes an inductive research process as the qualitative data results will lead to a working hypothesis. The data collection tool for this study is a semi-structured interview. As a multi-case study, interviews were done with six councillors from five municipalities that represent different municipal size classifications. These municipalities have chosen to opt out of retail cannabis stores. The study is cross-sectional due to the fact that information was gained from the particular moment in time that municipalities decided to opt out of retail cannabis stores. Ultimately, this study’s overall aim is to provide a greater understanding towards the influences, motivations and decisions arrived upon by municipal councils that decided to opt out of physical cannabis stores.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know