Development and Validation of a Finger Tremor Simulator
Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, ISSN: 0840-7789, Vol: 2018-May, Page: 1-4
2018
- 8Citations
- 11Usage
- 15Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- CrossRef3
- Usage11
- Abstract Views11
- Captures15
- Readers15
- 15
Conference Paper Description
Tremor, being one of the most severe symptoms of Parkinson's disease, has been considered as not only a medical problem but also an engineering problem. Increasingly, wearable technologies are being considered as a viable treatment option. In order to study and control tremor in the field of engineering, the first step often includes modeling and simulation, as access to patients is limited. With the successful realization of a finger tremor simulator, a wearable tremor suppression device could be validated prior to testing on humans. In this study, a tremor simulator was designed and validated with recorded patient tremor data. Two experimental assessments were conducted on the validation of tremor motion reproduction and tremor torque reproduction. The results showed that the proposed simulator has 9%, 82%, and 141% error in the reproduction of the power of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd harmonics of the tremor, and 11.89% mean error on motion reproduction. The tremor torque measured at the index finger metacarpophalangeal joint is 0.02pm 0.02 Nm, and the output torque from the tremor simulator is 0.03 pm 0.01 Nm. Further parameter adjustment of the control system is required to improve performance.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85053619091&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ccece.2018.8447595; https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8447595/; https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/mechanicalpub/30; https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1032&context=mechanicalpub
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know