Selectivity of conventional electrodes for recording motor evoked potentials: An investigation with high-density surface electromyography
Muscle and Nerve, ISSN: 1097-4598, Vol: 55, Issue: 6, Page: 828-834
2017
- 14Citations
- 37Usage
- 43Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations14
- Citation Indexes14
- 14
- CrossRef13
- Usage37
- Downloads37
- Captures43
- Readers43
- 43
- Mentions1
- Blog Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent Blog
Can the Recording of Motor Potentials Evoked by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Be Optimized?
Introduction Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with surface electromyography has been for a long time an important non-invasive tool to investigate and better understand how brain controls the skeletal muscles. If a single pulse is applied over a particular spot of the primary motor cortex, the generated action potentials travel down the corticospinal tract reaching a specific muscle or g
Article Description
Introduction: The objective of this study was to determine whether motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited with transcranial magnetic stimulation and measured with conventional bipolar electromyography (EMG) are influenced by crosstalk from non-target muscles. Methods: MEPs were recorded in healthy participants using conventional EMG electrodes placed over the extensor carpi radialis muscle (ECR) and high-density surface EMG (HDsEMG). Fifty MEPs at 120% resting and active motor threshold were recorded. To determine the contribution of ECR to the MEPs, the amplitude distribution across HDsEMG channels was correlated with EMG activity recorded during a wrist extension task. Results: Whereas the conventional EMG identified MEPs from ECR in >90% of the stimulations, HDsEMG revealed that spatial amplitude distribution representative of ECR activation was observed less frequently at rest than while holding a contraction (P < 0.001). Conclusions: MEPs recorded with conventional EMG may contain crosstalk from non-target muscles, especially when the stimulation is applied at rest. Muscle Nerve 55: 828–834, 2017.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85011629000&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mus.25412; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27649483; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mus.25412; https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/ptpub/121; https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1123&context=ptpub; https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mus.25412
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know