PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Selectivity of conventional electrodes for recording motor evoked potentials: An investigation with high-density surface electromyography

Muscle and Nerve, ISSN: 1097-4598, Vol: 55, Issue: 6, Page: 828-834
2017
  • 14
    Citations
  • 37
    Usage
  • 43
    Captures
  • 1
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Most Recent Blog

Can the Recording of Motor Potentials Evoked by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Be Optimized?

Introduction Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with surface electromyography has been for a long time an important non-invasive tool to investigate and better understand how brain controls the skeletal muscles. If a single pulse is applied over a particular spot of the primary motor cortex, the generated action potentials travel down the corticospinal tract reaching a specific muscle or g

Article Description

Introduction: The objective of this study was to determine whether motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited with transcranial magnetic stimulation and measured with conventional bipolar electromyography (EMG) are influenced by crosstalk from non-target muscles. Methods: MEPs were recorded in healthy participants using conventional EMG electrodes placed over the extensor carpi radialis muscle (ECR) and high-density surface EMG (HDsEMG). Fifty MEPs at 120% resting and active motor threshold were recorded. To determine the contribution of ECR to the MEPs, the amplitude distribution across HDsEMG channels was correlated with EMG activity recorded during a wrist extension task. Results: Whereas the conventional EMG identified MEPs from ECR in >90% of the stimulations, HDsEMG revealed that spatial amplitude distribution representative of ECR activation was observed less frequently at rest than while holding a contraction (P < 0.001). Conclusions: MEPs recorded with conventional EMG may contain crosstalk from non-target muscles, especially when the stimulation is applied at rest. Muscle Nerve 55: 828–834, 2017.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know