'Fundamental causes' of health disparities: A comparative analysis of Canada and the United States
International Sociology, ISSN: 0268-5809, Vol: 24, Issue: 1, Page: 93-113
2009
- 53Citations
- 161Usage
- 100Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations53
- Citation Indexes50
- 50
- CrossRef46
- Policy Citations3
- Policy Citation3
- Usage161
- Abstract Views161
- Captures100
- Readers100
- 83
- 17
- Mentions1
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Article Description
This article examines the relative impact of socioeconomic status as a 'fundamental cause' of health disparities in Canada and the US. Fundamental cause theory suggests that persons of higher socioeconomic status have available a broad range of resources to benefit their health and therefore hold an advantage in warding off whatever particular threats to health exist at a given time. This leads to two predictions: (1) SES is more strongly associated with diseases that are more highly preventable than with less preventable diseases; and (2) SES has a stronger relationship to health in the US, where higher economic inequality and a lack of universal health insurance leads to a greater vying for resources. Findings indicate lower levels of SES increase the odds of experiencing a highly preventable disease relative to a less preventable disease in the US, but not in Canada, suggesting that social policies and level of economic inequality may buffer the relationship between socioeconomic resources and the incidence of preventable disease. © International Sociological Association.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=58149510193&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0268580908099155; https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0268580908099155; https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/sociologypub/22; https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1021&context=sociologypub
SAGE Publications
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know