P25. Psychological Well-Being in Sport: Examining the construct validity of a modified version of the Scales of Psychological Well-Being
2017
- 247Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage247
- Abstract Views136
- Downloads111
Poster Description
Background: Participation in sport can contribute in individuals' physical health, psychological well-being (PWB), and general quality of life (Coakley, 2007). In the sport literature, the majority of studies have failed to distinguish between general well-being and well-being specific to the sport context (Lundqvist, 2011). This is partly because of a lack of sport specific PWB measurement tools; thus the purpose of the present study was to adapt an existing PWB global instrument (i.e., Scales of Psychological Well-Being; Ryff, 1989) for the sport context and examine the construct validity of the modified version of the instrument.Methods: Nine experts assessed the content relevance of each of the modified items of three scales (i.e. Personal Growth through Sport, Purpose in Sport, Self-Acceptance in Sport) of the SPWB. 400 athletes (Mage = 25.507, SD = 7.34), engaged in a variety of sports completed the modified questionnaire. Factorial validity was examined using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).Results: Taking into account the experts’ assessments regarding the content validity of the modified items, 19 out of 42 items were retained with additional modifications. After the items have been finalized, model fit of the hypothesized three-factor model was examined. The data revealed adequate fit to the model. Revision may needed for some items.Discussion & Conclusion: Initial support is provided for the construct validity of SPWB in Sport indicating that the modified instrument is relevant for the sport domain.Interdisciplinary Reflection: Researchers and sport psychology consultants are encouraged to use the SPWB for assessing athletes’ PWB. However, more research is needed to further evaluate the validity of the SPWB.Keywords: psychological well-being, construct validity, sport
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know