Talent Retention: An Empirical Examination of a 21st Century United States Department of Agriculture
2020
- 1,031Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage1,031
- Downloads926
- Abstract Views105
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Federal organizations at all levels are experiencing difficulty retaining talented employees and must examine current strategies to retain talented high performing employees. Thirty-one percent of government-wide employees will be eligible to retire by 2022 (GAO, 2019). As a result, government organizations need to examine generational expectations and values related to talent retention, which may prove beneficial when developing strategies for the current workforce. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with twenty-five Generation X and millennial federal government employees to gain an in-depth understanding of their insights related to talent retention in the federal government context. Additionally, supplemental quantitative data were collected that integrate leader-member exchange (LMX) research to help inform talent retention in the federal government. Findings from this study emphasize Generation X and millennial federal government employees’ experiences and identify seven categories outlining the reasons why they chose to stay: organizational pride, communication, workplace culture, job resources, learning and development, career growth, leadership. Some of these drivers of talent retention have been identified in previous literature; however, until now, they have not yet been shown to be relevant in the federal government context. The study also uncovered two novel drivers of talent retention termed organizational pride and 360 communication (a sub-category of communication). Results expand previous talent retention research by providing new insights into federal government employees’ experiences and what drives them to stay. This study’s findings have numerous theoretical and practical implications that are discussed. Findings will serve as a foundation for future research on Generation X and millennials on talent retention in the federal government. Based on the study’s findings, I conclude with seven recommendations that reinforce the positive value of organizational pride, 360 communication, career growth, and learning and development
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know