From “Uni-professional” to “Inter-professional” – Strategies for Remodeling Curricula
2016
- 83Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage83
- Downloads57
- Abstract Views26
Lecture / Presentation Description
Up until recently, health professions education was very much focused on single disciplines. Training occurred in silos with little attention to teams or other integrative work situations. This workshop will help participants explore and share various strategies to activate and bring together learners from different fields and strengthen their current or future collaboration in patient care. Workshop leaders will briefly share their extensive experience helping multiple institutions move towards inter-professionalism training. The majority of the session participants will work individually or in small groups, exploring key features and instructional strategies useful for each of the four curriculum phases: Needs Assessment, Planning, Implementation and Program Evaluation. Small groups will present to each other in a summary discussion. The workshop will end with sharing Take-Home Points.Outline:Introduction & welcome (5 min)Examples of transformed projects/curricula (mini-presentations, 15 min)Key elements/strategies for each of the 4 curriculum phases (small group exercise with flipcharts and post-its, 20 min)Presentation & discussion (large group activity, 15 min)Take-home points (large group activity, 5 min)Learning Objectives:By the end of the workshop participants should be able to… List 3 curricula/projects that address more than one profession List 3 characteristics/topics that unify multiple professions in the healthcare field List 3 strategies for helping learners work together more effectively
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know