The Barking Man: A Case Study of Rootwork in Psychiatry
Jefferson Journal of Psychiatry, ISSN: 1935-0783, Vol: 9, Issue: 1
1991
- 6,921Usage
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage6,921
- Downloads6,667
- 6,667
- Abstract Views254
- Captures2
- Readers2
Article Description
Cultures and sub-cultures attempt to describe illness in ways that are most understandable to the people who live in that community. These groups may differ when describing the etiology, course and treatment of any given ailment. Mental illness is just as susceptible to being explained in a manner which differs from group to group. Not surprisingly, psychiatrists trained under the auspices of "mainstream America"-that is, where the Western Judeo-Christian paradigm reigns, may find themselves dismissing symptoms of other sub-cultures. Some patients may have manifestations of true mental illness; others may have symptoms which are culturally sanctioned but which we label as mental illness. We may even misdiagnose behavioral variation among cultural groups as serious disease.This paper is specifically concerned with the phenomenon of rootwork, a magical system of explaining sickness and health among some people in the United States. More specifically, a case is described where the severe symptoms of one patient went misdiagnosed as a result of cross-cultural confusion. Such misunderstandings can become clearer for those able to think about how mental illness crosses cultures and may become a new entity to that different group of people. Cross-cultural psychiatry is interested in the interface between such different groups. Additionally, difficulties with treatment of one culture's disease by another culture's remedies are discussed.
Bibliographic Details
http://jdc.jefferson.edu/jeffjpsychiatry/vol9/iss1/11; http://dx.doi.org/10.29046/jjp.009.1.009; https://jdc.jefferson.edu/jeffjpsychiatry/vol9/iss1/11; https://jdc.jefferson.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1274&context=jeffjpsychiatry; https://dx.doi.org/10.29046/jjp.009.1.009; https://jdc.jefferson.edu/jeffjpsychiatry/vol9/iss1/11/
Thomas Jefferson University
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know