Oncology Hospital at Home: A retrospective chart review examining whether oncology patients placed under observation status by the ED could be managed in the home setting
2020
- 96Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage96
- Downloads51
- Abstract Views45
Abstract Description
Introduction: Hospital at Home (HaH) programs deliver hospital-level care in the home setting rather than in the traditional inpatient unit. In the US, this model of care has focused on the general medicine population, but no such models for adult oncologic care have been described in the literature to date. The current study seeks to identify whether certain diagnoses of patients with cancer admitted to observation status are predictive for early discharge and potentially model diagnoses on which to build a HaH program.Methods: Electronic medical records were reviewed for 130 adult cancer patients presenting to the Thomas Jefferson University Hospital ED from 2018-2019 who were subsequently placed under observation status. Patients were placed into 13 groups according to the primary conditions that warranted their update to observation status. Kruskal-Wallis analysis was done to identify differences in length of stay between groups. Chi-squared analysis was done to identify differences in likelihood of admission vs. discharge following observation.Results: There was no significant difference in length of stay between groups (p = 0.83). No significant differences were observed for either time in observation (��2 (24, N=130) = 46.05, p = 0.12) or observation end event (��2 (36, N=130) = 20.26, p = 0.68) among diagnostic groups.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know