Integrated 3D geological modeling of Sonda-Jherruck coal field, Pakistan
Journal of Sustainable Mining, Vol: 17, Issue: 3
2021
- 41Usage
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage41
- Abstract Views41
- Captures3
- Readers3
Article Description
Despite being one of the largest coal fields in Pakistan, the Sonda-Jherruck coal resource is yet to be exploited. Exploration studies were done between 1981 and 1989 by the Geological Survey of Pakistan (GSP) and the United States Geological Survey (USGS). While much exploratory data is available, computer-aided geological modeling has not been carried out. The resource estimation was carried out using the traditional circular 891 method. The specified distance between observational points remains constant, disregarding continuity in seam thickness that leads to higher uncertainty. Fault modeling and geologic mapping were not performed in preliminary reports. Fault lines based on aerial maps are indicated. This study generated 3D solid seam models and a fault model of the deposit. Coal seams were modeled to produce spatial distribution maps for seam thickness. The overall in-place coal resources of the deposit are estimated to be 4.66 billion tons, however mineable resources are estimated to be 1.59 billion tons. The method of fault detection is based on drill hole data. Dipping was calculated using regular grid data and the unknown points were estimated using the inverse distance weighting squared method. The assessed fault zones were compared with the USGS fault lines and an apparent similarity was observed.
Bibliographic Details
https://jsm.gig.eu/journal-of-sustainable-mining/vol17/iss3/3; http://dx.doi.org/10.46873/2300-3960.1129; https://jsm.gig.eu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1129&context=journal-of-sustainable-mining; https://dx.doi.org/10.46873/2300-3960.1129; https://jsm.gig.eu/journal-of-sustainable-mining/vol17/iss3/3/
Glowny Instytut Gornictwa (Central Mining Institute)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know