Personal Journey of CPE-Graduate Science Teachers: A Phenomenological Inquiry
2021
- 14Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage14
- Abstract Views14
Artifact Description
This research study is a qualitative investigation that specifically applies phenomenology to explore the lived experience of CPE-Graduate Science Teachers. Data were collected through personal interviews with eight (8) participants using open-ended questions. A 9th participant was chosen to validate repetition of responses and confirm the presence of data saturation. Colaizzi’s method was used for data analysis. After a thorough analysis of the transcripts, three (3) emergent themes and eleven (11) clustered themes have emerged to capture the participants’ lived experience: “Better Working Benefits,, “Proximity to Family,” “Teaching Beyond Area of Expertise,” “Dearth of Learning Resources,” “Different Strokes for Different Folks,” “Deficient Training Ground,” “Coping through Trainings,” “Love for Work,” “Socialization and Support,” “Touch of Joy,” and “Core Values Yearned.” The study concluded that participants’ reasons for changing their careers are to attain stability and receive enough compensation without being away from their families. They have also faced different problems when they entered into the teaching profession such as teaching beyond their area of expertise, insufficient learning resources and dealing with different learners. However, they have also done some adjustments to cope with these challenges by doing research, asking help from colleagues and attending seminars and trainings. Lastly, the participants have learned to love and find joy in their profession. Fulfillment then followed after they became committed to their profession and were able to touch and change the lives of their students.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know