Security and Privacy Requirement Analysis of Blockchain-based e-Voting System
2022
- 34Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage34
- Abstract Views34
Artifact Description
Taking into account the importance and sensitivity of the voting process, more and more efforts are being made to ensure that the entire process is carried out safely, accurately and as quickly as possible. As we know, conventional voting does not always guarantee that all these are achieved, because there are many factors that prevent the development of an ideal electoral process, such as cost of time and efforts needed for tallying and counting results, cost in papers, etc. In this paper we will present an approach for building an electronic voting system, which will contribute to increasing credibility to election results, building trust in electoral management and also improving the overall efficiency of the electoral process. We will introduce a view of how this system would look like with the use of Blockchain technology, we will also present some of its features with the help of programming design patterns. Finally, we will present a table that contains all the mechanisms used that cover the most important requirements needed for a blockchain based voting system.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know