Factors Associated with Risky Sexual Practices among Female Sex Workers in Karnataka, India
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 8, Issue: 4, Page: e62167
2013
- 27Citations
- 12Usage
- 59Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations27
- Citation Indexes27
- 27
- CrossRef18
- Usage12
- Abstract Views12
- Captures59
- Readers59
- 59
Article Description
Introduction:The objectives of this study are to develop a summary measure of risky sexual practice and examine the factors associated with this among female sex workers (FSWs) in Karnataka, India.Materials and Methods:Data were drawn from special behavioral surveys (SBS) conducted in 2007 among 577 FSWs in two districts of Karnataka, India: Belgaum and Bangalore. FSWs were recruited using the two-stage probability sampling design. FSWs' sexual practice was considered risky if they reported inconsistent condom use with any sexual partner and reported experience of one of the following vulnerabilities to HIV risk: anal sex, alcohol consumption prior to sex and concurrent sexual relationships.Results:About 51% of FSWs had engaged in risky sexual practice. The odds of engaging in risky sex were higher among FSWs who were older (35+ years) than younger (18-25 years) (58% vs. 45%, Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR): 2.0, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2-3.4), who were currently married than never married (61% vs. 51%, AOR: 4.8, 95% CI: 2.5-9.3), who were in sex work for 10+ years than those who were in sex work for less than five years (66% vs. 39%, AOR: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.6-4.2), and who had sex with 3+ clients/day than those who had sex with fewer clients (67% vs. 38%, AOR: 3.7, 95% CI:2.5-5.5).Conclusion:FSWs who are older, currently married, practicing sex work for longer duration and with higher clientele were more likely to engage in risky sexual practices. HIV prevention programs should develop strategies to reach these most-at risk group of FSWs to optimize the effectiveness of such programs. © 2013 Mahapatra, et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0062167; 10.1371/journal.pone.0062167.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0062167.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0062167.t003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84876323547&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062167; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23637991; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062167.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062167.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062167; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062167.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062167.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062167.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062167.t003; https://knowledgecommons.popcouncil.org/departments_sbsr-hiv/506; https://knowledgecommons.popcouncil.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1505&context=departments_sbsr-hiv; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062167.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062167.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062167.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062167.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062167; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062167; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062167.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062167.t002; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062167; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062167&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062167.t002; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0062167; http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0062167#pone-0062167-t001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062167&type=printable; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0062167; http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0062167#pone-0062167-t003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062167; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062167.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062167.t003; http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0062167#pone-0062167-t002
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know