Integrating adolescent livelihood activities within a reproductive health programme for urban slum dwellers in India
2006
- 35Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage35
- Downloads28
- Abstract Views7
Report Description
Although a wide variety of livelihood programs for adult women exist in India, they rarely include adolescent girls. Of those that do, few employ rigorous scientific methods to evaluate program impact. This brief describes a project conducted in slum areas of Allahabad, in Uttar Pradesh. The Population Council, in collaboration with CARE-India, tested the feasibility and impact of adding four livelihoods and life-skill components to a reproductive health program for adolescent girls (both school-going and out-of-school) aged 14–19. Using a quasi-experimental pre- and post-test design that contrasted the experimental group with a comparison group of adolescents, the project investigated whether the intervention increased girls' physical mobility and contact with individuals outside the family; enhanced girls' skills development and sustained use of these skills; altered work aspirations of girls and encouraged more progressive gender-role norms; reduced gender differentials in time use; and increased girls' reproductive health knowledge.
Bibliographic Details
https://knowledgecommons.popcouncil.org/departments_sbsr-pgy/1285; http://dx.doi.org/10.31899/pgy18.1009; https://knowledgecommons.popcouncil.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2329&context=departments_sbsr-pgy; https://dx.doi.org/10.31899/pgy18.1009; https://knowledgecommons.popcouncil.org/departments_sbsr-pgy/1285/
Population Council
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know