Pathways to service access for pre-eclampsia and eclampsia in rural Bangladesh: Exploring women s care-seeking
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 16, Issue: 2 February, Page: e0245371
2021
- 8Citations
- 15Usage
- 85Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- Usage15
- Abstract Views15
- Captures85
- Readers85
- 85
Article Description
Background While women in low-and middle-income countries face a range of barriers to accessing care for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, there is little understanding of the pathways taken to overcome these constraints and reach the services they need. This study explores the perspectives of women and communities on the influences that impact care-seeking decisions and pathways to health services. Methods To understand individual perspectives, we conducted 22 in-depth interviews (IDIs) with preeclampsia and eclampsia survivors (PE/E) in a tertiary hospital, where they received care after initiating PE/E services in different parts of the country. In four districts, we conducted one male and one female focus group discussion (FGD) to unearth care-seeking pathways and explore normative perspectives and the range of internal and external influences. Careful thematic analysis using Atlas-Ti was applied. Results Prevailing views of women and communities across settings in Bangladesh indicate varied pathways to care throughout their pregnancy, during childbirth, and in the postnatal period influenced by internal and external factors at the individual, familial, social, and health systems levels. Internal influences draw on women s own awareness of hypertension complications and options, and their ability to decide to seek care. External factors include social influences like family and community norms, culturally-Accepted alternatives, and community perceptions of the health system s capacity to provide quality care. The interaction of these factors often delay care seeking and can lead to complex pathways to care. Conclusion Women s individual pathways to care were diverse, despite the homogenous community perceptions of the influences on women s care-seeking behaviors. This finding supports the need for improving quality of care in primary healthcare facilities and strengthening gender equity and community-based promotion activities through targeted policy and programming.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0245371; 10.1371/journal.pone.0245371.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0245371.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0245371.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0245371.t001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85100555254&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245371; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33539410; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245371; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245371.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245371.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245371.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245371.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245371.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245371.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245371.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245371.t001; https://knowledgecommons.popcouncil.org/departments_sbsr-rh/1384; https://knowledgecommons.popcouncil.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2385&context=departments_sbsr-rh; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245371.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245371.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245371.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245371.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245371; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245371; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245371.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245371.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245371.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245371.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0245371&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know