Introducing birth plans in Mexico: An exploratory study in a hospital serving low-income Mexicans
Birth, ISSN: 1523-536X, Vol: 34, Issue: 1, Page: 42-48
2007
- 28Citations
- 2Usage
- 93Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations28
- Citation Indexes25
- 25
- CrossRef23
- Policy Citations3
- Policy Citation3
- Usage2
- Abstract Views2
- Captures93
- Readers93
- 93
Article Description
Background: Increased medicalization of childbirth in Mexico has not always translated into more satisfactory childbirth experiences for women. In developed countries, pregnant women often prepare written birth plans, outlining how they would like their childbirth experiences to proceed. The notion of expressing childbirth desires with a birth plan is novel in the developing world. We conducted an exploratory study to assess the feasibility and acceptability of introducing birth plans in a hospital serving low-socioeconomic status Mexicans and to document women's and health practitioners' perspectives on the advantages and barriers in implementing a birth plan program. Methods: We invited 9 pregnant women to prepare birth plans during their antenatal care visits. The women also participated in interviews before and after childbirth. We also conducted in-depth interviews with 4 women who had given birth in the past year, and with 2 nurses, 2 social workers, and 1 physician to learn about their perspectives on the benefits and challenges of implementing a birth plan program. Results: All 9 women who completed a birth plan found the experience highly satisfying, despite the fact that in some cases, their childbirths did not proceed as they had specified in their plans. Interviewed practitioners believed that birth plans could improve the childbirth experience for women and health care practitioners, but facilities often lacked space and financial incentives for birth plan programs. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that birth plans are acceptable and feasible in this study population. Facility administrators would need to commit to provide the physical space and financial incentives necessary to ensure successful implementation. (BIRTH 34:1 March 2007) © 2007, Blackwell Publishing, Inc.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33847058484&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536x.2006.00124.x; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17324177; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00124.x; http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00124.x; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1523-536X.2006.00124.x; https://knowledgecommons.popcouncil.org/departments_sbsr-rh/2201; https://knowledgecommons.popcouncil.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3202&context=departments_sbsr-rh
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know