Development of a quality assurance procedure for reproductive health services for district public health systems: Implementation and scale-up in the state of Gujarat
2008
- 343Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage343
- Downloads277
- Abstract Views66
Report Description
This project was carried out in India, in two districts each in Gujarat and Maharashtra states. It confirmed that quality assurance (QA) checklists and an implementation manual, developed by the USAID-funded Frontiers in Reproductive Health (FRONTIERS) Program of the Population Council in collaboration with UNFPA/India, are useful and effective tools that the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (MOHFW) can use to monitor the quality of services provided by health facilities. It also demonstrated that this QA mechanism can be easily institutionalized at the district level management. One key lesson has been the critical role that the commitment of state officials plays in the success of such interventions and their scale up and institutionalization. The proven effectiveness of the QA mechanism and its scaling up in Gujarat State has prompted the national MOHFW to introduce it into six other states, with a slightly enlarged scope for the QA visits. FRONTIERS, PATH, and EngenderHealth are providing technical assistance to support this scale up, with funding from USAID, UNFPA, and GTZ.
Bibliographic Details
https://knowledgecommons.popcouncil.org/departments_sbsr-rh/422; http://dx.doi.org/10.31899/rh4.1169; https://knowledgecommons.popcouncil.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1421&context=departments_sbsr-rh; https://dx.doi.org/10.31899/rh4.1169; https://knowledgecommons.popcouncil.org/departments_sbsr-rh/422/
Population Council
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know