Increasing coverage of reproductive health issues in the Indonesian print media
2001
- 151Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage151
- Downloads114
- Abstract Views37
Report Description
With the reform movement in Indonesia, the FRONTIERS project recognized the new opportunities for influencing public debate and informing public opinion on reproductive health issues and undertook a project for disseminating the results of contemporary research on reproductive health. The project had three main objectives: 1) to increase print media coverage of critical reproductive health issues by enhancing journalists’ role as responsible communication agents; 2) to contribute to public debate on emerging reproductive health issues in order to influence policy development and guide program management; and 3) to increase public awareness of key health issues, with a particular focus on crisis-related reproductive health needs. The impact of this project was assessed in terms of the gains in journalists’ technical knowledge about the themes of the media forums and the number and quality of their published articles. Based on the results of the process and media monitoring evaluations, the 18-month media information dissemination project had a positive impact on the coverage of reproductive health in the Indonesian print media. The project demonstrated that media could be effectively utilized to extend the reach of research findings and to initiate public debate regarding important reproductive health issues.
Bibliographic Details
https://knowledgecommons.popcouncil.org/departments_sbsr-rh/425; http://dx.doi.org/10.31899/rh4.1172; https://knowledgecommons.popcouncil.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1424&context=departments_sbsr-rh; https://dx.doi.org/10.31899/rh4.1172; https://knowledgecommons.popcouncil.org/departments_sbsr-rh/425/
Population Council
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know