The role of public-sector family planning programs in meeting the demand for contraception in Sub-Saharan Africa
International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, ISSN: 1944-0405, Vol: 43, Issue: 2, Page: 41-50
2017
- 22Citations
- 8Usage
- 101Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations22
- Citation Indexes22
- 22
- Usage8
- Abstract Views8
- Captures101
- Readers101
- 101
Article Description
CONTEXT: Commonly used indicators of contraceptive behavior in a population—modern contraceptive prevalence (mCPR), unmet need for contraception, demand for contraception and demand satisfied—are not well-suited for evaluating the progress made by government family planning programs in helping women and men achieve their reproductive goals. METHODS: Trends in these measures in 26 Sub-Saharan African countries between 1990 and 2014 were examined. Trends in a proposed new indicator, the public-sector family planning program impact score (PFPI), and its relationship to mCPR and the family planning effort score were also assessed. Case studies were used to review public family planning program development and implementation in four countries (Nigeria, Ethiopia, Rwanda and Kenya). RESULTS: The four commonly used indicators capture the extent to which women use family planning and to which demand is satisfied, but shed no direct light on the role of family planning programs. PFPI provides evidence that can be used to hold governments accountable for meeting the demand for family planning, and was closely related to policy developments in the four case-study countries. CONCLUSIONS: PFPI provides a useful addition to the indicators currently used to assess progress in reproductive health and family planning programs.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85036578547&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1363/43e3917; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29261505; http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1363/43e3917; https://knowledgecommons.popcouncil.org/departments_sbsr-rh/842; https://knowledgecommons.popcouncil.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1843&context=departments_sbsr-rh
Guttmacher Institute
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know