Integrating the palliative care principles of shared decision making and advance care planning into heart failure management : a pilot project
2018
- 145Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage145
- Downloads124
- Abstract Views21
Artifact Description
Integrating the Palliative Care Principles of Shared Decision Making and Advance Care Planning into Heart Failure Management: A Pilot Project Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome associated with a high mortality rate, frequent hospitalizations, and significant symptom burden that often contributes to a poor quality of life. Palliative care (PC), historically associated with managing the end- of-life needs of cancer patients, offers opportunities to improve health-related quality of life for those with HF in conjunction with, or instead of, life-prolonging medical therapies. The aim of this project was to evaluate and address patient-specific needs for those with advanced HF. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) was administered to patients recently hospitalized for acutely decompensated heart failure who were referred to a hospital-affiliated heart failure clinic for ongoing disease management. Of 26 questionnaires administered, 10 patients met inclusion criteria and agreed to participate. These patients were randomly allocated in a 1:1 fashion to one of two groups, with either usual care or usual care plus PC intervention. All received guideline-directed HF treatment; the intervention group also participated in one-on-one semi-structured interviews with a nurse practitioner experienced in both HF management and PC. After three months, patients were re-evaluated with the KCCQ, and baseline and 3-month results were compared and analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-ranked test. Although no statistically significant change was noted, clinically significant change was found through validated KCCQ score changes in both groups. This project emphasized the need for concurrent guideline-directed HF therapy and palliative interventions. Long- term, consistent care is essential for this patient population to achieve patient-centered care that is congruent with their needs and wishes. Keywords: Heart failure, palliative care, shared decision-making, health-related quality of life, patient-centered care, advance care planning
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know