Integrating Primary Care into Behavioral Health: Evaluating an Evidence-based Referral process in a Community Mental Health Facility
2013
- 21Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage21
- Downloads21
Thesis / Dissertation Description
A collaboration to serve individuals with mental disorders and co-morbid physical health issues is vital to improving health care outcomes for the individual as a whole. Objective: This project sought to answer the following research questions: (a) Did the patients with mental illness attend referred appointments at the co-located primary health care clinic?; (b) If referred appointments at the primary health care clinic were missed, what were the most common reasons?; ( c) Did the primary care and mental health care prescribers at the colocated clinics report that the referral process was beneficial? Results: Throughout this 8 week project, there were 47 patients referred; 11 (23.4%) showed for the primary care appointment; 36 (76.6%) patients did not make it to the primary care appointments. Of the 11 who made their appointment, 10 (90%) had same day appointments, meaning the patient had both a mental health and a primary care appointment scheduled on the san1e day. Patients were asked the main reasons for missing primary care appointments; 24 (66.66%) missed due to transportation issues; 10 (27.77%) missed due to forgetfulness; 2 (5.5%) already established another primary care provider outside of Metrocare. A survey among the mental health and primary health care prescribers was done to attest to the helpfulness of the referral process. The survey was ranked on a Likert scale of 1 to 4 with 1 being not helpful to 4 being most helpful. Overall, the prescribers thought the process was helpful. Conclusions: Establishing a new referral process in an already busy mental health clinic was challenging. Overall, the clients presented with both mental health and primary health care needs, yet it appeared that maintaining scheduled primary care appointments was troublesome.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know