Provider Recommendation: Influence on Colorectal Cancer Screening
2018
- 11Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage11
- Downloads9
- Abstract Views2
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer related death yet is one of the most preventable. The goal of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable and the United States Preventive Services Task Force is that 80% of eligible patients will be screened by the year 2018. Provider recommendation has a positive impact on colorectal cancer screening rates. Methods: Completion of colorectal cancer screening rates after use of a provider standard scripted recommendation versus usual care was compared. Post intervention retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate the percentage of patients who completed colorectal cancer screenings. Design: A pre- and post -intervention design was utilized to establish a correlation between the standard script recommendation versus usual care on completion rates. Population/Setting: A convenience sample of patients ages 50-75 who were reported as noncompliant and seen during a 3-month period in 2017 received the intervention. They were compared to patients who received usual care in a similar period prior to the intervention. Data Collection/Implementation Plan: The clinic’s information technology department provided a list of all patients between ages 50-75 who had not completed screening confirmed by chart review. Analysis: A two-sample chi-square test examining provider recommendation using a standard script and usual care showed no significant difference (p > 0.005, 95%), (Fisher’s Exact p = 0.156, N = 169). Descriptive statistics revealed White men had the highest rates of completing screening after receiving a recommendation from their provider in the usual manner.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know