Weight Bias and Mindset in Physical Educators
2020
- 42Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage42
- Downloads28
- Abstract Views14
Thesis / Dissertation Description
While physical education (PE) classes and sports teams create an opportunity to increase overweight and obese students’ interest in physical activity (Price, 1990), these are settings in which such students encounter stigma from PE teachers and coaches (Bauer et al., 2004). Weight bias predicts negative psychological (Eisenberg et al., 2003) and physical (Hunger & Yomiyama, 2014) outcomes in children and adolescents, which could be offset by positive behaviors related to growth mindset in teachers. The current study examined weight bias in elementary PE teachers as well as the influence of teacher sport-related mindset on weight bias. PE teachers (N = 286) completed a survey assessing personality, demographics, and sport-related mindset. They viewed one of eight profiles of a 10-year-old student before rating the student’s motivation, success, and personality. The profiles differed by gender, body mass index (BMI: normal vs. obese), and health habits and fitness test scores (healthy vs. unhealthy). PE teachers rated average weight students more favorably than obese students in terms of motivation and laziness. Teachers also rated healthy students as more motivated/successful, more trustworthy/intelligent, and less lazy than unhealthy students. Participants’ own BMI, tenure, and personality characteristics influenced their perceptions of students, particularly those who were obese. Teachers’ sport-related mindset did not play a role in their weight bias. Results highlight the need for future research on weight bias in PE teachers and interventions to reduce such bias.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know