40 Years After Buffalo Creek: Digital Memory and Environmental Advocacy in Contemporary Appalachia
2014
- 41Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage41
- Abstract Views41
Artifact Description
This presentation explores the potential of digital memory as a viable resource for Appalachian social and environmental advocates. To investigate this potential, this presentation examines a series of digital remembrances marking the 40th anniversary of the Buffalo Creek, WV flood. The flood, which was a result of the failure of a coal slurry impoundment dam, killed 125 residents, injured 1,100, and left 4,000 homeless. The disaster remains etched within the Appalachian consciousness, yet little has been done to try to understand how the memory of such an event may provide a rhetorical and political resource for environmental advocates. This presentation argues that these acts of remembrance serve as a form of public memory and as such provide a resource to constitute an environmental public responsive to and critical of the contexts and practices of contemporary risk society, especially in relation to the contemporary practices of the coal mining industry and the state officials who oversee the industry. By weaving remembrances of the past disaster at Buffalo Creek with the contemporary concerns of Appalachia, these current commemorations dialogically create “coalitions of anxiety” (Zinn 38) and “create meaning through time” (Olick 83) that challenge notions of security proposed by coal and government officials. In keeping with the conference theme, these digital commemorations take a known reality, the past, to imagine new possibilities of how to think about and address contemporary environmental concerns.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know