Examining Feminism in Appalachia through Contemporary Issues: A Discussion of Intersections and Place
2017
- 137Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage137
- Abstract Views137
Dataset Description
At the 2016 conference, the session “Examining Feminism in Appalachia through Historical Scholarship: A Discussion of Women of the Mountain South” attracted a large audience, and the discussion among presenters and attendees brought up many contemporary aspects of feminism in Appalachia that were mentioned only briefly due to the session time limit. For example, feminism is not fully integrated within Appalachian Studies, and the concept of place is not significantly present in feminist discussions on intersectionality. Thus, we want to carry the conversation forward this year by turning our attention to contemporary feminism in Appalachia. The presenters represent a mix of academic, community, and activist perspectives, and we intend to begin the conversation by introducing topics including the intersections of power and privilege for women and feminist ideas in Appalachia, the importance of social media and feminism in Appalachia, and ecofeminist activism and livelihoods. Moreover, we intend to promote feminist commitments to social justice by making space available for audience participation in order to invite as many voices into the discussion as possible. The purpose of this roundtable discussion is to continue and advance the discussion of feminism in Appalachia among and for scholars, activists, and community members who are engaged in work related to women’s and gender issues.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know