Local Coverage of the MVP Pipeline: A Moral Panic Theory Approach
2019
- 42Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage42
- Abstract Views42
Artifact Description
On October 23, 2015, Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC filed a formal application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for approval for a natural gas pipeline system spanning over 300 miles from West Virginia to Virginia, including multiple counties in Appalachia. From the start, the project was controversial. Numerous groups have formed in an effort to stop construction.Moral panics are widespread fears, based often on exaggerated claims, that a group’s values or way of life are being threatened. If successful, a panic typically results in the passage of new laws or policies that target the source of the panic, leading to increased social control. Moral panic theory argues the modern mass media is the most effective spark for the creation of a moral panic.[1]This paper will examine local coverage from the Roanoke Times of the pipeline from October 1, 2015, to September 30, 2018. Specifically, the paper will use frame analysis to search for concepts from moral panic theory, to ask: are local newspapers framing the debate as a moral panic? Framing of the issue in the media is the first step in determining if local activists are successfully creating a moral panic which could lead to the permanent shutdown of the pipeline. Results and implications are discussed using social movement theory and moral panic theory frameworks.[1] Goode, Erich and Nachman Ben-Yehuda. 2010. Moral Panics: The Social Construction of Deviance: John Wiley & Sons.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know