Autoregressive Modeling of Geomagnetic Data.(Dept.E)
MEJ. Mansoura Engineering Journal, Vol: 20, Issue: 2, Page: 29-40
2021
- 27Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage27
- Downloads27
Article Description
Geomagnetic (GM) data generally appear to have significant organization or structure. We attempted to determine if GM records could be modeled as an autoregressive process with a white noise excitation during the short-time period of one month. The autoregressive (ER) model is then used to synthesize GM signals using AR coefficients and a white noise excitation with the same propability distribution function as those determined from the autoregressive model of an ensemble of monthly records. Both the original and synthesized monthly records are then compared using the root-mean-square (rms) amplitude, the number of zero crossing per month. the number of peaks, and the amplitude distributions of the signals. The results of examining the synthesized GM records indicate that there are no significant differences in the values of these parameters. The use of such synthesized GM records may allow more through testing of forecasting algorithms than is possible with the present limited number of GM records.
Bibliographic Details
Egypts Presidential Specialized Council for Education and Scientific Research
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know