Evaluation of Bored Piles Load Capacity in Rock Bearing. (Dept. C)
Bulletin of the Faculty of Engineering. Mansoura University, Vol: 40, Issue: 5, Page: 64-73
2020
- 62Usage
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage62
- Downloads47
- Abstract Views15
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
Rock socketed bored piles are particularly advantageous for conditions in which rock is near the ground surface underlying weak layers. This paper aims to predicate the ultimate capacity of bored piles supported in rock using analytical and mathematically based graphical approaches. Data-base of pile load tests from three projects constructed in Abu-Dhabi city in UAE were used, and Finite Element Analysis using 2-D Plaxis axisymmetric model has been developed to simulate the behaviour of such piles. The ultimate load predicted from the FEM method is compared with that estimated from the theoretical approaches. The pile working load with the corresponding settlements estimated from the theoretical approaches based on reasonable factor of safety were evaluated based on the results of pile load tests. From this study it was found that, the results of pile ultimate load estimated from the static formula were closer to those predicted by the FEM, compared with those calculated by modified Chin and Hansen methods. Under the ultimate load settlement was about 2.3% of pile diameter. While the socket length of a pile into rock is an important factor, the strength and R.Q.D. of rock seem to be the most significant parameters even for lesser socket length. The limiting displacement, after which the applied axial load is shared between the side resistance and the base resistance, has found to vary between 0.3% to 1.1% of rock socketed pile length, depending on the rock strength and R.Q.D.
Bibliographic Details
Egypts Presidential Specialized Council for Education and Scientific Research
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know